Saturday, August 13, 2011

amigas por siempre_11

images Canciones Con Acción Para Niños amigas por siempre_11. Atestiguan por ti melódicas y
  • Atestiguan por ti melódicas y



  • vinzak
    04-13 06:53 PM
    i remember someone posting right here in IV that they got their GC when PD was not current. USCIS later asked for the GC back cuz it was given in error.:) To make things worse the poor guy obviously didnt renew his EAD and couldnt work.

    So even if you get GC out of turn, I believe the correct thing to do is to return it. Or it can be more problems.


    Here's the link on that topic:
    http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/forum105-immigrant-visa/659959-gc-received-in-error.html





    wallpaper Atestiguan por ti melódicas y amigas por siempre_11. Traicionada por su olfato a la
  • Traicionada por su olfato a la



  • eb3_nepa
    07-20 09:01 PM
    Can you please provide me a bit more insight for this topic or please point me where i can get some more details, if possible.
    I'm on H1B 8th year, stuck with EB3 Retro with a priority date of Nov/03. My wife has a PhD in Molecular Biology, one of the hot subjects all across the globe.

    I'll truly appreciate

    You can consult any lawyer. To the best of my knowledge you dont need employer sponsorship if ur a PhD although i could be wrong.





    amigas por siempre_11. por no encontrar tu calor.
  • por no encontrar tu calor.



  • immi2006
    05-04 12:59 PM
    Hi,

    I spent 2 weeks just looking at all immigration.com posts and analysing the data patterns posted on the BEC, permtracker, calif 140 stage and so on... no one has published a report for a ready reckoner. I wanted to see the data sample to see where we stand today on the status as a snapshot, the data could be off the mark, because there could be folks who filed multiple LCs, and not withdrawn when one of them is approved !..or there could be employers who may have filed Eb2 and Eb3 for same person, cannot gurantee... so, the data is based on all postings of immigration.com, I would encourage u to read some of the posts to get a first hand feeling of the trends.





    2011 Traicionada por su olfato a la amigas por siempre_11. Por
  • Por



  • bharad
    09-21 04:01 PM
    wanted to share my experience with anticompete

    I have been a consultant with vendor V at client C for over 4 years now, wanted to change the vendor but this guy showed an anti compete I signed with him at previous client(no contract signed for current client though) mentioning anticompete for any future clients of Vendor.

    The company is based off New York where anticompete is followed, so I had to forgo my plans of joining another vendor for the client.



    more...


    amigas por siempre_11. hablando de mil cosas por
  • hablando de mil cosas por



  • Seems
    02-13 05:46 PM
    Legal Immigrants - Speak up!
    Immigration Voice is your voice
    Find your voice with Immigration Voice
    A Time To Act - don't just sit and wait for GC
    Get Involved - Its Your Life!
    Boond boond sey banta saagar - Join IV and be heard!





    amigas por siempre_11. Por lo que ya sabes,
  • Por lo que ya sabes,



  • needhelp!
    03-09 01:50 PM
    IV needs to compile all your replies. Please send them ASAP.



    more...


    amigas por siempre_11. POR MI PRINCIPE ETERNO
  • POR MI PRINCIPE ETERNO



  • sertasheep
    07-26 09:55 PM
    Nice.





    2010 por no encontrar tu calor. amigas por siempre_11. Canciones Con Acción Para Niños
  • Canciones Con Acción Para Niños



  • eb3retro
    09-14 03:50 PM
    NO, that part applies to a person applying for Advance Parole (humanitarian reason) and not Advance Parole (baed on peding I-485).

    This confusion is because the form is used for multiple application type - Rentry Permit, Refugee Travel Document, Advance Parole (humanitarian and I-485 pending). I think USCIS should redesign separate form for each application type to remove the confusion.

    If your AP is based on a pending I-485 you must be in the US to apply and receive the approval. If you need to travel before the approval, you could go to a local USCIS office to expedite the application.

    frostrated, this exactly contradicts your take on this issue. I understand your family has gone to india without ap in hand and have come back with AP (approval after leaving US). My question is how safe it is to do this.



    more...


    amigas por siempre_11. que antes yo sentía por tí
  • que antes yo sentía por tí



  • sgorla
    06-05 05:42 PM
    The online status of my package on USPS tracking page shows same message as yours. It just struck me that how can a certified mail be delivered to the agency if one is sending it to a PO Box. I mean how can USPS get a delivery signature from a real person if the address is not a physical address, but a PO Box number. Any thoughts?

    I dont know if other Folks have seen the same thing. My renewal EAD application has reached Texas (TSC) today June 5th around noon by USPS Express Mail but the status says

    Status: Notice Left

    We attempted to deliver your item at 11:16 AM on June 5, 2008 in MESQUITE, TX 75185 and a notice was left. A second delivery attempt will be made. If unsuccessful, we will hold it for five business days and then it will be returned to the sender. Information, if available, is updated every evening. Please check again later.

    The address where i sent is
    USCIS
    Texas Service Center
    P.O. Box 851041
    Mesquite, TX 75185-1041

    Any clue what may be going on - this is another round of fun :confused:





    hair Por amigas por siempre_11. Amigos y Poemas: QUERERTE A TI
  • Amigos y Poemas: QUERERTE A TI



  • TomPlate
    02-03 05:04 PM
    Can you please let me know anyone. I had this doubt because one of my friend is saying,

    During PORT OF ENTRY AP can only be used with EAD. Expired EAD will be an issue here.
    Even if you do not use EAD and in H1.


    PLEASE LET ME KNOW:confused:



    more...


    amigas por siempre_11. sólo esperando por ti.
  • sólo esperando por ti.



  • Karthikthiru
    06-15 01:47 PM
    Tell the previously employer EXPLICITY that it is only a employment verification letter NOT A REFERENCE letter. Because by default lot of them assume it is a reference letter. Aslo by law they have to provide the experience letter


    Thanks

    Karthik





    hot hablando de mil cosas por amigas por siempre_11. y con los niños va por donde
  • y con los niños va por donde



  • reddy_h
    01-07 10:38 PM
    You will only be counted against the cap once unless your 6 year limit of H-1 is over and you are out of US for another year. So no problems you can file for your new H-1. Just make sure you send a copy of the old H-1 approval copy as well to prove you are already counted towards cap.



    more...


    house Por el camino a la vera amigas por siempre_11. arrastrados por el peso
  • arrastrados por el peso



  • abhijitp
    01-20 05:59 PM
    Thanks everyone who showed up. We actually did better than we had expected.

    A total of 55 letters signed today, and will be dispatched tomorrow to the White House and to IV.

    Go NORCAL, go IV!





    tattoo Por lo que ya sabes, amigas por siempre_11. Que por ti llegaría a las
  • Que por ti llegaría a las



  • psaxena
    02-04 06:02 PM
    Lets meet up on the weekend in a park or something, we can do the potluck. It will be an open place , so no restriction or shortage of space if there are a lot of people. Would be a good social networking and also the meeting as well.

    I am open to all the suggestions. I am pretty new to the website, can administrator provide the list, that can be used to communicate

    Thanks



    more...


    pictures POR MI PRINCIPE ETERNO amigas por siempre_11. Déjame por un tiempo que te
  • Déjame por un tiempo que te



  • randomdude
    12-07 12:11 PM
    There is no gain in waiting longer.

    What is AC21? It exists due to immigration rules of limited PDs and backlogs which prolong the processing time of a 485 beyond 180 days. Since these delays are caused by their system, they have provided the option of switching employers as long as certain criteria is met.

    As long as you meet the critieria you are all set. Waiting longer without meeting the criteria will be of no use and if you meet all the requirements of AC21, there is no reason to wait.

    Thanks for replying KaiserSoze...nice name btw, hope you are not a figment of imagination like the one in the movie ;-)

    I don't intend to be intrusive, but are you currently on EAD? Or do you plan to move to it?

    I have also read at multiple places that the receipt date is the date from which we start counting 180 days for AC21. I believe that this date still holds true when one's case is transferred from say NSC to TSC. Does anyone know this for sure?

    As luck would have it, my contract with my client ends on the 183rd day of my receipt date! Hence this and the original question





    dresses y con los niños va por donde amigas por siempre_11. por verte un instante
  • por verte un instante



  • pansworld
    07-07 04:26 PM
    But at least they will be alerted to a problem. Maybe someone will take notice. Maybe they wont. If not we will figure something else out...my two cents



    more...


    makeup que antes yo sentía por tí amigas por siempre_11. Por el camino a la vera
  • Por el camino a la vera



  • Dakota Newfie
    07-13 09:36 AM
    Since the topic of giving preference to professional athletes has come up, I'd like to relay an the experience I had when I came to the U.S. for a job interview in August of '01; when going through U.S. customs at Logan Airport (this was pre 9/11), I was arbitrarily "singled out for interrogation" for TWO HOURS! During that time, a customs official made some small talk with me while we waited for the supervisor to arrive and he asked me if I was a hockey player (since I am Canadian) to which I replied "no"; he then informed me that was too bad because otherwise I would pass through without any problems or questions! Too bad they didn't "single out" Atta and the boys the same way two weeks later- or maybe they went through as hockey players!





    girlfriend Que por ti llegaría a las amigas por siempre_11. lo malo por dentro Yo no
  • lo malo por dentro Yo no



  • p.guptapost
    06-04 10:09 AM
    Hi,

    We paper filed thru about company attorney in May 1st week from Texas. Till now no receipt received.
    Is there any way I can call USCIS to check status without receipt number in hand? Can they track it via SSN or alien no?

    Pl. let me know.





    hairstyles sólo esperando por ti. amigas por siempre_11. salí por el mundo cantando
  • salí por el mundo cantando



  • Ramkumar
    03-17 10:58 AM
    Hi,

    I�m in EB2 and My I-140 was approved September 2008 through Employer A. And I got laid off on November 2009 from EMP A, within 15 days I joined another Employer B. As per policy, employer B is not going to file GC for me. Already I spend 5 years on my H1B. I check with EMP A�s HR dept, they will not revoke my I-140 and H1B. I know AC21 is one of the options to transfer (Portability) my PD to Emp B after apply I-485.

    It would be great if I get answer the below my Question:

    1. If my PD is current, Will I eligible to apply I-485 using Employer A I-140 approved?
    2. What are the documents needed from employer A, if I want apply I-485?
    3. All my friends telling me, I can apply I-485, Is it true?

    Tons of Thanks,
    Ramkumar





    jambapamba
    07-05 12:53 PM
    I think so too. They were sh*t scared on the number of apps they were going to receive. And just when they were increasing fees and wanting to show how their performance was going to improve, it became current. It would have been a bad rap for them and fee increase would not have been justifiable.

    It is mostly be cause they wanted to teach a lesson to DOS for opening the floodgates. Also, backlogs are one key performance indicator for USCIS and is reported to congress. If 100k, plus people apply right away and another 300k in next couple of months, it would look bad on their records.





    deardar
    09-14 03:41 PM
    i meant the quality was like, that perhaps my computer is messing it up



    No comments:

    Post a Comment